In physical cosmology, the Big Bang is the scientific theory that the Universe
emerged from an enormously dense and hot state about 13.7 billion years ago. The
Big Bang is a consequence of the observed Hubble's law velocities of distant
galaxies that when taken together with the cosmological principle imply that
space is expanding according to the Friedmann-Lemaître model of general
relativity. Extrapolated into the past, these observations show that the
Universe has expanded from a primeval state, in which all the matter and energy
in the Universe was at an immense temperature and density. Physicists do not
widely agree on what happened before this, although general relativity predicts
a gravitational singularity.
The term Big Bang is used both in a narrow sense to refer to a point in time
when the observed expansion of the Universe (Hubble's law) began—calculated to
be 13.7 billion (1.37 × 1010) years ago—and in a more general sense to refer to
the prevailing cosmological paradigm explaining the origin and expansion of the
Universe, as well as the composition of primordial matter through
nucleosynthesis as predicted by the Alpher-Bethe-Gamow theory.
One consequence of the Big Bang is that the conditions of today's Universe are
different from the conditions in the past or in the future. From this model,
George Gamow in 1948 was able to predict, at least qualitatively, the existence
of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB). The CMB was discovered in the
1960s and further validated the Big Bang theory over its chief rival, the steady
state theory.
Physical cosmology
Age of the universe
Big Bang
Comoving distance
Cosmic microwave background
Dark energy
Dark matter
FLRW metric
Friedman equations
Galaxy formation
Hubble's law
Inflation
Large-scale structure
Lambda-CDM model
Nucleosynthesis
Redshift
Shape of the universe
Timeline of the Big Bang
Timeline of cosmology
Ultimate fate of the universe
Related topics
Astrophysics
General relativity
Particle physics
Quantum gravity
edit
History
Main article: History of the Big Bang
The Big Bang theory developed from observations and theoretical considerations.
Observationally, it was determined that most spiral nebulae were receding from
Earth, but those who made the observation weren't aware of the cosmological
implications, nor that the supposed nebulae were actually galaxies outside our
own Milky Way. In 1927, the Belgian Catholic priest Georges Lemaître
independently derived the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker equations and
proposed, on the basis of the recession of spiral nebulae, that the Universe
began with the "explosion" of a "primeval atom"—what was later called the Big
Bang.
In 1929, Edwin Hubble provided an observational basis for Lemaître's theory. He
discovered that, relative to the Earth, the galaxies are receding in every
direction at speeds directly proportional to their distance from the Earth. This
fact is now known as Hubble's law (see Edwin Hubble: Mariner of the Nebulae by
Edward "Christian" s" on). Given the cosmological principle whereby the
Universe, when viewed on sufficiently large distance scales, has no preferred
directions or preferred places, Hubble's law suggested that the Universe was
expanding.
This idea allowed for two opposing possibilities. One was Lemaître's Big Bang
theory, advocated and developed by George Gamow. The other possibility was Fred
Hoyle's steady state model in which new matter would be created as the galaxies
moved away from each other. In this model, the Universe is roughly the same at
any point in time. It was actually Hoyle who coined the name of Lemaître's
theory, referring to it sarcastically as "this big bang idea" during a program
broadcast on March 28, 1949 by the BBC Third Programme. Hoyle repeated the term
in further broadcasts in early 1950, as part of a series of five lectures
entitled The Nature of Things. The text of each lecture was published in The
Listener a week after the broadcast, the first time that the term "big bang"
appeared in print. [1]
For a number of years the support for these theories was evenly divided.
However, the observational evidence began to support the idea that the Universe
evolved from a hot dense state. Since the discovery of the cosmic microwave
background radiation in 1965 it has been regarded as the best theory of the
origin and evolution of the cosmos. Virtually all theoretical work in cosmology
now involves extensions and refinements to the basic Big Bang theory. Much of
the current work in cosmology includes understanding how galaxies form in the
context of the Big Bang, understanding what happened at the Big Bang, and
reconciling observations with the basic theory.
Huge advances in Big Bang cosmology were made in the late 1990s and the early
21st century as a result of major advances in telescope technology in
combination with large amounts of satellite data such as that from COBE, the
Hubble Space Telescope and WMAP. Such data has allowed cosmologists to calculate
many of the parameters of the Big Bang to a new level of precision and led to
the unexpected discovery that the expansion of the Universe appears to be
accelerating. (See dark energy.)
See also: Timeline of cosmology
Overview
A graphical timeline is available here:
Graphical timeline of the Big Bang
Based on measurements of the expansion of the Universe using Type Ia supernovae,
measurements of the lumpiness of the cosmic microwave background, and
measurements of the correlation function of galaxies, the Universe has a
calculated age of 13.7 ± 0.2 billion years. The agreement of these three
independent measurements is considered strong evidence for the so-called ΛCDM
model that describes the detailed nature of the contents of the Universe.
The early Universe was filled homogeneously and isotropically with an incredibly
high energy density and concomitantly huge temperatures and pressures. It
expanded and cooled, going through phase transitions analogous to the
condensation of steam or freezing of water as it cools, but related to
elementary particles.
Approximately 10-35 seconds after the Planck epoch a phase transition caused the
Universe to experience exponential growth during a period called cosmic
inflation. After inflation stopped, the material components of the Universe were
in the form of a quark-gluon plasma (also including all other particles—and
perhaps experimentally produced recently as a quark-gluon liquid [2]) in which
the constituent particles were all moving relativistically. As the Universe
continued growing in size, the temperature dropped. At a certain temperature, by
an as-yet-unknown transition called baryogenesis, the quarks and gluons combined
into baryons such as protons and neutrons, somehow producing the observed
asymmetry between matter and antimatter. Still lower temperatures led to further
symmetry breaking phase transitions that put the forces of physics and
elementary particles into their present form. Later, some protons and neutrons
combined to form the Universe's deuterium and helium nuclei in a process called
Big Bang nucleosynthesis. As the Universe cooled, matter gradually stopped
moving relativistically and its rest mass energy density came to gravitationally
dominate that of radiation. After about 300,000 years the electrons and nuclei
combined into atoms (mostly hydrogen); hence the radiation decoupled from matter
and continued through space largely unimpeded. This relic radiation is the
cosmic microwave background.
Over time, the slightly denser regions of the nearly uniformly distributed
matter gravitationally attracted nearby matter and thus grew even denser,
forming gas clouds, stars, galaxies, and the other astronomical structures
observable today. The details of this process depend on the amount and type of
matter in the Universe. The three possible types are known as cold dark matter,
hot dark matter, and baryonic matter. The best measurements available (from WMAP)
show that the dominant form of matter in the Universe is cold dark matter. The
other two types of matter make up less than 20% of the matter in the Universe.
The Universe today appears to be dominated by a mysterious form of energy known
as dark energy. Approximately 70% of the total energy density of today's
Universe is in this form. This component of the Universe's composition is
revealed by its property of causing the expansion of the Universe to deviate
from a linear velocity-distance relationship by causing spacetime to expand
faster than expected at very large distances. Dark energy in its simplest
formation takes the form of a cosmological constant term in Einstein's field
equations of general relativity, but its composition is unknown and, more
generally, the details of its equation of state and relationship with the
standard model of particle physics continue to be investigated both
observationally and theoretically.
All these observations are encapsulated in the ΛCDM model of cosmology, which is
a mathematical model of the Big Bang with six free parameters. Mysteries appear
as one looks closer to the beginning, when particle energies were higher than
can yet be studied by experiment. There is no compelling physical model for the
first 10-33 seconds of the Universe, before the phase transition called for by
grand unification theory. At the "first instant", Einstein's theory of
gravitation predicts a gravitational singularity where densities become
infinite. To resolve this paradox, a theory of quantum gravitation is needed.
Understanding this period of the history of the Universe is one of the greatest
unsolved problems in physics.
See also: Timeline of the Big Bang
Theoretical underpinnings
As it stands today, the Big Bang is dependent on three assumptions:
The universality of physical laws
The cosmological principle
The Copernican principle
When first developed, these ideas were simply taken as postulates, but today
there are efforts underway to test each of them. Tests of the universality of
physical laws have found that the largest possible deviation of the fine
structure constant over the age of the Universe is of order 10-5. The isotropy
of the Universe that defines the Cosmological Principle has been tested to a
level of 10-5 and the Universe has been measured to be homogenous on the largest
scales to the 10% level. There are efforts underway to test the Copernican
Principle by means of looking at the interaction of galaxy clusters with the CMB
through the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect to a level of 1% accuracy.
The Big Bang theory uses Weyl's postulate to unambiguously measure time at any
point as the "time since the Planck epoch". Measurements in this system rely on
conformal coordinates in which so-called comoving distances and conformal times
remove the expansion of the Universe, parameterized by the cosmological scale
factor, from consideration of spacetime measurements. The comoving distances and
conformal times are defined so that objects moving with the cosmological flow
are always the same comoving distance apart and the particle horizon or
observational limit of the local Universe is set by the conformal time.
As the Universe can be described by such coordinates, the Big Bang is not an
explosion of matter moving outward to fill an empty Universe; what is expanding
is spacetime itself. It is this expansion that causes the physical distance
between any two fixed points in our Universe to increase. Objects that are bound
together (for example, by gravity) do not expand with spacetime's expansion
because the physical laws that govern them are assumed to be uniform and
independent of the metric expansion. Moreover, the expansion of the Universe on
today's local scales is so small that any dependence of physical laws on the
expansion is unmeasurable by current techniques.
Observational evidence
It is generally stated that there are three observational pillars that support
the Big Bang theory of cosmology. These are the Hubble-type expansion seen in
the redshifts of galaxies, the detailed measurements of the cosmic microwave
background, and the abundance of light elements. (See Big Bang nucleosynthesis.)
Additionally, the observed correlation function of large-scale structure of the
cosmos fits well with standard Big Bang theory.
Hubble's law expansion
Main article: Hubble's law
Observations of distant galaxies and quasars show that these objects are
redshifted, meaning that the light emitted from them has been shifted to longer
wavelengths. This is seen by taking a frequency spectrum of the objects and then
matching the spectroscopic pattern of emission lines or absorption lines
corresponding to atoms of the chemical elements interacting with the light. From
this analysis, a redshift corresponding to a Doppler shift for the radiation can
be measured which is explained by a recessional velocity. When the recessional
velocities are plotted against the distances to the objects, a linear
relationship, known as Hubble's law, is observed:
where
v is the recessional velocity of the galaxy or other distant object
D is the distance to the object and
H0 is Hubble's constant, measured to be (71 ± 4) km/s/Mpc by the WMAP probe.
The Hubble's law observation has two possible explanations. One is that we are
at the center of an explosion of galaxies, a position which is untenable given
the Copernican principle. The second explanation is that the Universe is
uniformly expanding everywhere as a unique property of spacetime. This type of
universal expansion was developed mathematically in the context of general
relativity well before Hubble made his analysis and observations, and it remains
the cornerstone of the Big Bang theory as developed by
Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker.
Cosmic microwave background radiation
Main article: Cosmic microwave background radiation
WMAP image of the cosmic microwave background radiation
The Big Bang theory predicted the existence of the cosmic microwave background
radiation or CMB which is composed of photons emitted during baryogenesis.
Because the early Universe was in thermal equilibrium, the temperature of the
radiation and the plasma were equal until the plasma recombined. Before atoms
formed, radiation was constantly absorbed and reemitted in a process called
Compton scattering: the early Universe was opaque to light. However, cooling due
to the expansion of the Universe allowed the temperature to eventually fall
below 3,000 K at which point electrons and nuclei combined to form atoms and the
primordial plasma turned into a neutral gas. This is known as photon decoupling.
A Universe with only neutral atoms allows radiation to travel largely unimpeded.
Because the early Universe was in thermal equilibrium, the radiation from this
time had a blackbody spectrum and freely streamed through space until today,
becoming redshifted because of the Hubble expansion. This reduces the high
temperature of the blackbody spectrum. The radiation should be observable at
every point in the Universe to come from all directions of space.
In 1964, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, while conducting a series of diagnostic
observations using a new microwave receiver owned by Bell Laboratories,
discovered the cosmic background radiation. Their discovery provided substantial
confirmation of the general CMB predictions—the radiation was found to be
isotropic and consistent with a blackbody spectrum of about 3 K —and it pitched
the balance of opinion in favor of the Big Bang hypothesis. Penzias and Wilson
were awarded the Nobel Prize for their discovery.
In 1989, NASA launched the Cosmic Background Explorer satellite (COBE), and the
initial findings, released in 1990, were consistent with the Big Bang's
predictions regarding the CMB. COBE found a residual temperature of 2.726 K and
determined that the CMB was isotropic to about one part in 105. During the
1990s, CMB anisotropies were further investigated by a large number of
ground-based experiments and the Universe was shown to be almost geometrically
flat by measuring the typical angular size (the size on the sky) of the
anisotropies. (See shape of the Universe.)
In early 2003 the results of the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy satellite (WMAP)
were released, yielding what were at the time the most accurate values for some
of the cosmological parameters. (see cosmic microwave background radiation
experiments). This satellite also disproved several specific cosmic inflation
models, but the results were consistent with the inflation theory in general.
Abundance of primordial elements
Main article: Big Bang nucleosynthesis
Using the Big Bang model it is possible to calculate the concentration of
helium-4, helium-3, deuterium and lithium-7 in the Universe as ratios to the
amount of ordinary hydrogen, H. All the abundances depend on a single parameter,
the ratio of photons to baryons. The ratios predicted (by mass, not by number)
are about 0.25 for 4He/H, about 10-3 for 2H/H, about 10-4 for 3He/H and about
10-9 for 7Li/H.
The measured abundances all agree with those predicted from a single value of
the baryon-to-photon ratio. The agreement is relatively poor for 7Li and 4He,
the two elements for which the systematic uncertainties are least understood.
This is considered strong evidence for the Big Bang, as the theory is the only
known explanation for the relative abundances of light elements. Indeed there is
no obvious reason outside of the Big Bang that, for example, the young Universe
(i.e. before star formation, as determined by studying matter essentially free
of stellar nucleosynthesis products) should have more helium than deuterium or
more deuterium than 3He, and in constant ratios, too.
Galactic evolution and distribution
Main article: Large-scale structure of the cosmos
Detailed observations of the morphology and distribution of galaxies and quasars
provide strong evidence for the Big Bang. A combination of observations and
theory suggest that the first quasars and galaxies formed about a billion years
after the Big Bang, and since then larger structures have been forming, such as
galaxy clusters and superclusters. Populations of stars have been aging and
evolving, so that distant galaxies (which are observed as they were in the early
Universe) appear very different from nearby galaxies (observed in a more recent
state). Moreover, galaxies that formed relatively recently appear markedly
different from galaxies formed at similar distances but shortly after the Big
Bang. These observations are strong arguments against the steady-state model.
Observations of star formation, galaxy and quasar distributions, and larger
structures agree well with Big Bang simulations of the formation of structure in
the Universe and are helping to complete details of the theory.
Features, issues and problems
A number of problems have arisen within the Big Bang theory throughout its
history. Some of them are mainly of historical interest today, and have been
avoided either through modifications to the theory or as the result of better
observations. Other issues, such as the cuspy halo problem and the dwarf galaxy
problem of cold dark matter, are not considered to be fatal as they can be
addressed through refinements of the theory.
There are a small number of proponents of non-standard cosmologies who doubt
that there was a Big Bang at all. They claim that solutions to standard problems
in the Big Bang theory involve ad hoc modifications and addenda to the theory.
Most often attacked are the parts of standard cosmology that include dark
matter, dark energy, and cosmic inflation. However, while explanations for these
features remain at the frontiers of inquiry in physics, together they are
suggested by independent observations of big bang nucleosynthesis, the cosmic
microwave background, large scale structure and Type Ia supernovae. The
gravitational effects of these features are understood observationally and
theoretically but they have not yet been successfully incorporated into the
Standard Model of particle physics. Though some aspects of the theory remain
inadequately explained by fundamental physics, almost all astronomers and
physicists accept that the close agreement between Big Bang theory and
observation have firmly established all the basic parts of the theory.
The following is a short list of Big Bang "problems" and puzzles:
Horizon problem
The horizon problem results from the premise that information cannot travel
faster than light, and hence two regions of space which are separated by a
greater distance than the speed of light multiplied by the age of the Universe
cannot be in causal contact. The observed isotropy of the cosmic microwave
background (CMB) is problematic in this regard, because the horizon size at that
time corresponds to a size that is about 2 degrees on the sky. If the Universe
has had the same expansion history since the Planck epoch, there is no mechanism
to cause these regions to have the same temperature.
A resolution to this apparent inconsistency is offered by inflationary theory in
which a homogeneous and isotropic scalar energy field dominates the Universe at
a time 10-35 seconds after the Planck epoch. During inflation, the Universe
undergoes exponential expansion, and regions in causal contact expand so as to
be beyond each other's horizons. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle predicts
that during the inflationary phase there would be quantum thermal fluctuations,
which would be magnified to cosmic scale. These fluctuations serve as the seeds
of all current structure in the Universe. After inflation, the Universe expands
according to Hubble's law, and regions that were out of causal contact come back
into the horizon. This explains the observed isotropy of the CMB. Inflation
predicts that the primordial fluctuations are nearly scale invariant and
Gaussian which has been accurately confirmed by measurements of the CMB.
Flatness problem
The flatness problem is an observational problem that results from
considerations of the geometry associated with a
Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric. In general, the Universe can have
three different kinds of geometries: hyperbolic geometry, Euclidean geometry, or
elliptic geometry. The geometry is determined by the total energy density of the
Universe (as measured by means of the stress-energy tensor): hyperbolic results
from a density less than the critical density, elliptic from a density greater
than the critical density, and Euclidean from exactly the critical density. The
Universe is required to be within one part in 1015 of the critical density in
its earliest stages. Any greater deviation would have caused either a Heat Death
or a Big Crunch, and the Universe would not exist as it does today.
A possible resolution to this problem is again offered by inflationary theory.
During the inflationary period, spacetime expanded to such an extent that any
residual curvature associated with it would have been smoothed out to a high
degree of precision. Thus, it is believed that inflation drove the Universe to
be very nearly spatially flat.
Magnetic monopoles
The magnetic monopole objection was raised in the late 1970s. Grand unification
theories predicted point defects in space that would manifest as magnetic
monopoles with a density much higher than was consistent with observations,
given that searches have never found any monopoles. This problem is also
resolvable by cosmic inflation, which removes all point defects from the
observable Universe in the same way that it drives the geometry to flatness.
Baryon asymmetry
It is not yet understood why the Universe has more matter than antimatter. It is
generally assumed that when the Universe was young and very hot, it was in
statistical equilibrium and contained equal numbers of baryons and anti-baryons.
However, observations suggest that the Universe, including its most distant
parts, is made almost entirely of matter. An unknown process called baryogenesis
created the asymmetry. For baryogenesis to occur, the Sakharov conditions, which
were laid out by Andrei Sakharov, must be satisfied. They require that baryon
number be not conserved, that C-symmetry and CP-symmetry be violated, and that
the Universe depart from thermodynamic equilibrium. All these conditions occur
in the Standard Model, but the effect is not strong enough to explain the
present baryon asymmetry. New developments in high energy particle physics are
necessary to explain the baryon asymmetry.
Globular cluster age
In the mid-1990s, observations of globular clusters appeared to be inconsistent
with the Big Bang. Computer simulations that matched the observations of the
stellar populations of globular clusters suggested that they were about 15
billion years old, which conflicted with the 13.7-billion-year age of the
Universe. This issue was generally resolved in the late 1990s when new computer
simulations, which included the effects of mass loss due to stellar winds,
indicated a much younger age for globular clusters. There still remain some
questions as to how accurately the ages of the clusters are measured, but it is
clear that these objects are some of the oldest in the Universe.
Dark matter
Main article: Dark matter
During the 1970s and 1980s various observations (notably of galactic rotation
curves) showed that there was not sufficient visible matter in the Universe to
account for the apparent strength of gravitational forces within and between
galaxies. This led to the idea that up to 90% of the matter in the Universe is
not normal or baryonic matter but rather dark matter. In addition, assuming that
the Universe was mostly normal matter led to predictions that were strongly
inconsistent with observations. In particular, the Universe is far less lumpy
and contains far less deuterium than can be accounted for without dark matter.
While dark matter was initially controversial, it is now a widely accepted part
of standard cosmology due to observations of the anisotropies in the CMB, galaxy
cluster velocity dispersions, large-scale structure distributions, gravitational
lensing studies, and x-ray measurements from galaxy clusters. Dark matter has
only been detected through its gravitational signature; no particles that might
make it up have yet been observed in laboratories. However, there are many
particle physics candidates for dark matter, and several projects to detect them
are underway.
Dark energy
Main article: Dark energy
In the 1990s, detailed measurements of the mass density of the Universe revealed
a value that was 30% that of the critical density. Since the Universe is very
nearly spatially flat, as is indicated by measurements of the cosmic microwave
background, about 70% of the energy density of the Universe was left unaccounted
for. This mystery now appears to be connected to another one: Independent
measurements of Type Ia supernovae have revealed that the expansion of the
Universe is undergoing a non-linear acceleration rather than following strictly
Hubble's law. To explain this acceleration, general relativity requires that
much of the Universe consist of an energy component with large negative
pressure. This dark energy is now thought to make up the missing 70%. Its nature
remains one of the great mysteries of the Big Bang. Possible candidates include
a scalar cosmological constant and quintessence. Observations to help understand
this are ongoing.
The future according to the Big Bang theory
Before observations of dark energy, cosmologists considered two scenarios for
the future of the Universe. If the mass density of the universe is above the
critical density, then the Universe would reach a maximum size and then begin to
collapse. It would become denser and hotter again, ending with a state that was
similar to that in which it started—a Big Crunch. Alternatively, if the density
in the Universe is equal to or below the critical density, the expansion would
slow down, but never stop. Star formation would cease as the Universe grows less
dense. The average temperature of the Universe would asymptotically approach
absolute zero. Black holes would evaporate. The entropy of the Universe would
increase to the point where no organized form of energy could be extracted from
it, a scenario known as heat death. Moreover, if proton decay exists, then
hydrogen, the predominant form of baryonic matter in the Universe today, would
disappear, leaving only radiation.
Modern observations of accelerated expansion imply that more and more of the
currently visible Universe will pass beyond our event horizon and out of contact
with us. The eventual result is not known. The ΛCDM model of the Universe
contains dark energy in the form of a cosmological constant. This theory
suggests that only gravitationally bound systems, such as galaxies, would remain
together, and they too would be subject to heat death, as the Universe cools and
expands. Other explanations of dark energy—so-called phantom energy
theories—suggest that ultimately galaxy clusters and eventually galaxies
themselves will be torn apart by the ever-increasing expansion in a so-called
Big Rip.
See also Ultimate fate of the Universe.
Speculative physics beyond the Big Bang
While the Big Bang model is well established in cosmology, it is likely to be
refined in the future. Little is known about the earliest Universe, when
inflation is hypothesized to have occurred. There may also be parts of the
Universe well beyond what can be observed in principle. In the case of inflation
this is required: exponential expansion has pushed large regions of space beyond
our observable horizon. It may be possible to deduce what happened when we
better understand physics at very high energy scales. Speculations about this
often involve theories of quantum gravitation.
Some proposals are:
chaotic inflation
brane cosmology models, including the ekpyrotic model in which the Big Bang is
the result of a collision between branes
an oscillatory Universe in which the early Universe's hot, dense state resulted
from the Big Crunch of a universe similar to ours. The Universe could have gone
through an infinite number of big bangs and big crunches. The cyclic extension
of the ekpyrotic model is a modern version of such a scenario.
models including the Hartle-Hawking boundary condition in which the whole of
space-time is finite.
Some of these scenarios are qualitatively compatible with one another. Each
entails untested hypotheses.
Philosophical and religious interpretations
There are a number of interpretations of the Big Bang theory that are
extra-scientific. Some of these ideas purport to explain the cause of the Big
Bang itself (first cause), and have been criticized by some naturalist
philosophers as being modern creation myths. Some people believe that the Big
Bang theory lends support to traditional views of creation as given in Genesis,
for example, while others believe that the Big Bang theory is inconsistent with
such views.
The Big Bang, as a scientific theory, is not based on any religion. While some
religious interpretations conflict with the Big Bang story of the Universe,
there are many other interpretations that do not.
The following is a list of various religious interpretations of the Big Bang
theory:
A number of "Christian" churches, the Roman Catholic Church in particular, have
accepted the Big Bang as a possible description of the origin of the Universe,
interpreting it to allow for a philosophical first cause. Pope Pius XII was an
enthusiastic proponent of the Big Bang even before the theory was scientifically
well established.
Some students of Kabbalah, deism and other non-anthropomorphic faiths concord
with the Big Bang theory, for example connecting it with the theory of "divine
retraction" (tzimtzum) as explained by the Jewish scholar Moses Maimonides.
Some modern Islamic scholars believe that the Qur'an parallels the Big Bang in
its account of creation, described as follows: "Do not the unbelievers see that
the heavens and the earth were joined together as one unit of creation, before
We clove them asunder?" (Ch:21,Ver:30). The claim has also been made that the
Qur'an describes an expanding Universe: "The heaven, We have built it with
power. And verily, We are expanding it." (Ch:51,Ver:47). Parallels with the Big
Crunch and an oscillating Universe have also been suggested: "On the day when We
will roll up the heavens like the rolling up of the scroll for writings, as We
originated the first creation, (so) We shall reproduce it; a promise (binding on
Us); surely We will bring it about." (Ch:21,Ver:104).
Certain theistic branches of Hinduism, such as in Vaishnavism, conceive of a
theory of creation with similarities to the theory of the Big Bang. The Hindu
mythos, narrated for example in the third book of the Bhagavata Purana
(primarily, chapters 10 and 26), describes a primordial state which bursts forth
as the Great Vishnu glances over it, transforming into the active state of the
sum-total of matter ("prakriti"). Other forms of Hinduism assert a Universe
without beginning or end.
Buddhism has a concept of a Universe that has no creation event. The Big Bang,
however, is not seen to be in conflict with this since there are ways to
conceive an eternal universe within the paradigm. A number of popular Zen
philosophers were intrigued, in particular, by the concept of the oscillating
Universe.
Big Bang overviews
For an annotated list of textbooks and monographs, see physical cosmology.
Some primary sources
G. Lemaître, "Un Univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant
rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extragalactiques" (A
homogeneous Universe of constant mass and growing radius accounting for the
radial velocity of extragalactic nebulae), Annals of the Scientific Society of
Brussels 47A (1927):41—General relativity implies the universe has to be
expanding. Einstein brushed him off in the same year. Lemaître's note was
translated in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 91 (1931):
483–490.
G. Lemaître, Nature 128 (1931) suppl.: 704, with a reference to the primeval
atom.
R. A. Alpher, H. A. Bethe, G. Gamow, "The Origin of Chemical Elements,"Physical
Review 73 (1948), 803. The so-called αβγ paper, in which Alpher and Gamow
suggested that the light elements were created by protons capturing neutrons in
the hot, dense early universe. Bethe's name was added for symmetry.
G. Gamow, "The Origin of Elements and the Separation of Galaxies," Physical
Review 74 (1948), 505. These two 1948 papers of Gamow laid the foundation for
our present understanding of big-bang nucleosynthesis.
G. Gamow, Nature 162 (1948), 680.
R. A. Alpher, "A Neutron-Capture Theory of the Formation and Relative Abundance
of the Elements," Physical Review 74 (1948), 1737.
R. A. Alpher and R. Herman, "On the Relative Abundance of the Elements,"
Physical Review 74 (1948), 1577. This paper contains the first estimate of the
present temperature of the universe.
R. A. Alpher, R. Herman, and G. Gamow Nature 162 (1948), 774.
A. A. Penzias and R. W. Wilson, "A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at
4080 Mc/s," Astrophysical Journal 142 (1965), 419. The paper describing the
discovery of the cosmic microwave background.
R. H. Dicke, P. J. E. Peebles, P. G. Roll and D. T. Wilkinson, "Cosmic
Black-Body Radiation," Astrophysical Journal 142 (1965), 414. The theoretical
interpretation of Penzias and Wilson's discovery.
A. D. Sakharov, "Violation of CP invariance, C asymmetry and baryon asymmetry of
the universe," Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5, 32 (1967), translated in JETP Lett.
5, 24 (1967).
R. A. Alpher and R. Herman, "Reflections on early work on 'big bang' cosmology"
Physics Today Aug 1988 24–34. A review article.
Religion and philosophy
Leeming, David Adams, and Margaret Adams Leeming, A Dictionary of Creation
Myths. Oxford University Press (1995), ISBN 0195102754.
Pius XII (1952), "Modern Science and the Existence of God," The Catholic Mind
49:182–192.
Research articles
Most scientific papers about cosmology are initially released as preprints on
arxiv.org. They are generally technical, but sometimes have introductions in
plain English. The most relevant archives, which cover experiment and theory,
are the astrophysics archive, where papers closely grounded in observations are
released, and the general relativity and quantum cosmology archive, which covers
more speculative ground. Papers of interest to cosmologists also frequently
appear on the high energy phenomenology and high energy theory archives.
Categories: Cosmology | Astrophysics