Beware of the Green Invasion

| 0 comments

snatchers

Democrats and Republicans are they coming to your town as Green slime????

After writing a story because my website asks me for a title of the article on which basis it lists everything I feel obligated to provide one, though right now as an experiment I imagine publishing articles without titles. This story regards the Green Party, The Democrats, Republicans, and the political opposition in the United States, on which I can frame the matter either in regards to Democrats or Republicans as they in representation of the capitalist system in the United States, rightfully completely guilty for all crimes, high crimes and treason that has resulted in the last one hundred years of a society built on falsehoods and lies.

Or perhaps I should of entitled this article “the Green Party Invasion”, or “Invasion of the Democrat Republican body snatcher Zombies” for my creatively minded but American teenage readers. Do I have any “American teenage readers”?

Don't let the Kids Know!!!

Don’t let the Kids Know!!!

Whose Green Party? I wrote, meaning whose “Green Party” was it. In what I envision of pro-Democrat and Republican elements into the Green Party to influence them adversely into positions that undermine their opponents.

First I will state as a non Green Party writer online I made many attempts to contact and clarify Google and the Green Party to draw these questions to their attention to straighten them out.

In what began as another instance of the many red baiting online the issues related came up in a Google Plus Community that alleged was supposed to represent the “Green Party” but did not as it was the “Unofficial Green Party” whatever that means. In what eventually got me banned from the groups which I prefer to call an psychological intelligence operation.

But who are the spies , agents provocateurs in the “Green Party” “community on Google Plus, I would venture to state that often they are a conglomeration of Republicans, Democrats and right winger trolls.

 

In numerous posts regarding questions pertaining to this groups that could of been easily resolved if its moderator was so inclined. But there was no such inclination as that “alleged Green party Democratic Party idiot [who] *** looks like Lyndon Larouche” made no such attempt to do so. As the alleged Green Party community organized and moderated by alleged Democrat Alvin Brinson was accuse of some sort of “electoral fraud” https://plus.google.com/111926082870071972680 which any sane person would think they should be interested at least to object in protest that that simply was not true.

Instead the “Green Party” community created controversy which is fine as I do not shy form such instances.

The allegations of the community’s moderator has been anything but consistent as though in his words he “banned from this community” based on Alvin Brinson’s lies that “A couple of posts he’d made cross the line into outright threats” (untrue) which Alvin Brinson allegedly “reported to Google and hence ‎removed” (removed by Alvin Brinson) though the perpetrator )me) was already banned by the moderators the posts in question were removed (by Alvin Brinson). Perhaps Mr. Alvin Brinson merely is a dunce when it comes to understanding the basics of language and communication. But such is life I can not blame him much for being a fool nor a thin skinned emotionally driven illogical idiot.

Where in a hypocritical lack of transparency, consistency, the group in question claimed

“As always, the actual discussions in this group are public” but “If anyone disagrees with this decision, contact me about it privately.”.

If anyone disagrees with my being the moderator of this community, then feel free to make a group decision as to who should be, and I’ll hand it over, or have an official green party representative come in and I’ll hand it over.

Until then the discourse here should remain civil. The Green Party will not achieve its goals upon the backs of ranting and raving lunaticery.

In any case in its own words “This group is here to discuss the Green Party, not someone’s ideas of how corrupt this group might be. As always, the actual discussions in this group ‎are public, and when I have to moderate someone, I will do it publicly just like now. If anyone disagrees with this decision, contact me about it privately. If anyone disagrees with my being the moderator of this community, then feel free to make a group decision as to who should be, and I’ll hand it over, ‎or have an official green party representative come in and I’ll hand it over. Until then the discourse here should remain civil. The Green Party will not achieve its goals upon the backs of ranting and raving lunaticery. ‎”

In what is all well and good but that statement lacks consistency and as a result lacks integrity as first the moderator on behalf of the group claims to represent the Green Party, but then it states it is “an unofficial” Green Party group in that the moderator had said

” First keep in mind that this group is not affiliated in any way with the actual Green Party. Notice the “Unofficial” tag under the title?” in what he responded to my posting of

“Open letter to membership and governing bodies of the Green Party in the USA”

As I have written publicly on the Green Party before and have been in contact with a number of prominent Green Party members where the Green Party has interested me in that it has been used by the major political parties in order to accomplish their political goals not the “:Green Party”.

Where I publicly stated “the question of the Green party relations with the military industrial complex and intelligence if any brave wished to discuss the relationship of German Greens with the Defense establishment (eg in NATO Germany) where they supported increased involvement of German troops overseas in support of the Imperialist adventures of the United States”. Long before Edward Snowden Exposes revealed the cooperation of American US and European Intelligence operatives.

Where as a member of the Socialist Party of the USA in 2007-2008 I raised questions of the police state and fascism in the United States long before those questions were raised by Ralph Nader and Chris Hedges. Views of mine opposing what is represented by a left in America and Europe which often is corrupt decadent and legally and electorally entrenched in support some how of Democrats, Republicans (Liberals, Conservatives, Labour and Tories, New Labour, etc.)

In what in the arrogant remarks of the moderator of the “Greens Party” community trivialized the threats of government spying on civilians by stating

” Second, it is a PUBLIC group. It would be the world’s luckiest spy who was assigned to spy on a PUBLIC discussion group.”

When that is exactly the point of the Snowden NSA revelations, where the same said moderator stated displayed insulting arrogance by stating:

” Removal of posts? I should start with yours!”

Where he threatened me and then showed incongruence in wavering as my posts had valid basis and to remove them would make him look bad, in what he displayed his vacillation.

“But since it is not outright spam or promotion of a commercial product with only a tenuous Green connection, I won’t.

Where arrogantly he claimed ignorance of exactly what I was saying (god forbid they would have to read hand written manuscripts as Marx and Lenin did) stating:

“Other than that, in not really sure what the point of your disjointed rambling is.

Could you elucidate, in clear English with specific and documented examples? Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t remove from you the burden of presenting a clear argument and supporting it with proof.”

For which lately I have gotten into the habit a repeating the Buddhist parable of the “poisoned arrow” where it so much reminds me of petty bourgeois western intellectuals vacillating from one set of dilemma to another (like whores used by one man after another).

The sutta begins at Jetavana where the monk Malunkyaputta is troubled by Gautama Buddha’s silence on the fourteen unanswerable questions, which include queries about the nature of the cosmos and life after the death of a Tathāgata. Malunkyaputta then meets with Gautama and asks him for the answers to these questions, he says that if he fails to respond, Malunkya will renounce his teachings. Gautama Buddha responds by first stating that he never promised to reveal ultimate metaphysical truths such as those and then uses the story of a man who has been shot with a poisoned arrow to illustrate that those questions are irrelevant to his teachings.

“It’s just as if a man were wounded with an arrow thickly smeared with poison. His friends & companions, kinsmen & relatives would provide him with a surgeon, and the man would say, ‘I won’t have this arrow removed until I know whether the man who wounded me was a noble warrior, a priest, a merchant, or a worker.’ He would say, ‘I won’t have this arrow removed until I know the given name & clan name of the man who wounded me… until I know whether he was tall, medium, or short… until I know whether he was dark, ruddy-brown, or golden-colored… until I know his home village, town, or city… until I know whether the bow with which I was wounded was a long bow or a crossbow… until I know whether the bowstring with which I was wounded was fiber, bamboo threads, sinew, hemp, or bark… until I know whether the shaft with which I was wounded was wild or cultivated… until I know whether the feathers of the shaft with which I was wounded were those of a vulture, a stork, a hawk, a peacock, or another bird… until I know whether the shaft with which I was wounded was bound with the sinew of an ox, a water buffalo, a langur, or a monkey.’ He would say, ‘I won’t have this arrow removed until I know whether the shaft with which I was wounded was that of a common arrow, a curved arrow, a barbed, a calf-toothed, or an oleander arrow.’ ”

Where moral of the story is “The man would die and those things would still remain unknown to him.”

As simply I asked

“Geez Where do I begin? Asking who the heck are you? Why should you be trusted?”

Which was rudely responded to in “Care to provide more entertainment?”.

As perhaps for the two party system opposition groups have become mainly sideshow “entertainment” to their cheap two rings circus.

Where recently there has been a proliferation of agent groups online that exists as “Anarchist, socialist, Communist, Democratic, Republican, democratic, republican, labor, Arab, Moslem, Afghan, Iranian, Chinese.

Where though one with long pedigrees and track records can question the existence of these fly by night groups, the thieves respond by turning it all around in gas-lighting their victims by casting doubts within more doubts as an intelligence police trick saying as in this group some did.

“Maybe”,  “Maybe”,  “Maybe”,  “Maybe”,  “Maybe”,

XYZ “is the “plant”. They seem to show up in these kind of groups to create doubt, dissension, and what “plants” always do….”

When they first word they use is “Maybe”.

With plenty of advise “Try to shut it down”

in their ignorance as “Maybe” is not wisdom or knowledge.

In “My experience with #occupylasvegas” of questionable pedigrees that are wishy washy and coming out of no where

The moon Alice? (American colloquial)

In arrogance they lecture in covering what we already know in that we write exposing those matters that they should know or find out before they speak as they said

“that the Democrat party sent in troublemakers to create the same shit. They don’t want a true liberal /progressive contingency to get a foothold like the tea party has done with the Republicans.”

true true true

“So they send in several “types”…. 1.the ambitious leader. A person who just takes over. They will not be denied. They sell a portion of the group into buying into a non-democratic leadership model. Anyone who then questions this is confronted by 2.the intimidater. it’s self explanatory 3.the chaos. this one can be genuinely nuts. he’s there to make it all fall apart by alienating sane people and attracting negative attention to the group”

As I said and was shown publicly I was attacked threatened and banned from the group in question.

Where again comes  “Maybe”,  “Maybe”,  “Maybe”,  “Maybe”,

“You can end up with one or all of these trying to fudge shit up. I’m not a song anyone in this thread or group is one of those types. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were here though. You can bet they’re in the anonymous groups….. stuff like that.”

In the nonsense that comes unstructured groups.

Though on incurring these circumstances I almost immediately attempted to contact real Green Party nationally on many state levels and emailed Cindy Sheehan on the matter as my posting to this “Green Party” group began by my posting humbly:

Cindy Sheehan American mom peace activist extraordinaire, who was the 2012 vice-‎presidential nominee of the Peace and Freedom Party‎

Cindy Sheehan American peace mom activist extraordinaire, who was the 2012 vice-‎presidential nominee of the Peace and Freedom Party‎

Open letter to membership and governing bodies of the Green Party in the USA:

I noticed the peculiarity of Goggle+ groups as it is designed to enable facilitation of manipulation of posting within groups like this in what disadvantages of proper discussion.

Noticed that when the basis of posting are pages by people such as myself and other sorts of pages, where those postings are not handled similarly.

Posts disappear if the initial posters in a group are blocked as I would because there are government spies in this group.!?

That is not the case in many traditional massage groups in what leads me to believe many features of Goggle+ were designed with ulterior motives by people like those in the NSA.

I was going to discuss some aspects of what some people commonly refer to by the misnomer “Democratic socialism”.

I wrote which perhaps as always needs proofreading and copy editing:

“Open letter to membership and governing bodies of the Green Party in the USA”

Where I have always discussed matters in a very public manner unlike these groups as they say “in private” for if they discuss these matter in the vitriolic and questionable manner they do publicly I can only imagine what they say in private.

As it seems that there are questionable doubts as to the political process in the United States, where both the Democrats and Republicans rely on third parties for maintaining their control on politics in the United States. Through an ongoing manipulation of the people and electorate which directly or indirectly will eventually lead to the downfall of the United States as the two system can not retain any integrity in the absence of a proper and viable opposition. Beyond the scope of funding for the two ring circus of a deceptive shallow electoral popularity beauty contest of shopping list talking points, spin doctors and talking heads full of nonsense and foolish stupidity.

Where nine out of ten green party offices if they had telephones were answered like much of the left by answering machines.

Do you know who really answer your telephone when you are not home?

Do you know who really answer your telephone when you are not home?

Where most often for legal questions I frame issues often in the form of questions rather than making baseless blunt America style generalizations, that none the less are taken as direct threats, to be ignored or trivialized as it addresses the politics and political system for which we  can easily say the same.

 

Author: Andrew Stergiou

First online publisher of a literary art journal in the world.

Leave a Reply